Sunday, March 4, 2012

WOMEN CAN BE PARTNERS IF THEY DON'T HAVE KIDS

Vlad called a meeting. An urgent meeting. This always spelled trouble The calendar appointment was sent last night for a meeting at 8am. With three school aged children, getting into the city was a bit like climbing mount Everett with a broken leg but I did it. I wished I'd had time to find the citation as an employer of choice for women so I could flush it down the toilet, but that would have to wait.

The subject of the meeting was partner promotion candidates and he invited me and all of the group head partners to the meeting. No one had any information about what this meeting was about. There were no papers attached to the meeting maker. Vlad rarely committed anything to writing. That way if things turned to shit he could always find a way to blame someone else and deny everything.

However, when we got to the meeting, we were each given a list of all lawyers in the senior lawyer category. This was a very long list as there was a bit of a bottle neck. This is very common in large law firms with everyone wanting a piece of the action. You could see that in the eyes of everyone around that table they were wondering how long this meeting was going to take and what use it was. After all appointing new partners had great potential to reduce the amount of coin in their own pockets. The pie is only so big.

Vlad was clearly on a mission. He had no doubt been instructed from those on high that we had , once again, to develop very clear career plans for those people we thought had partner potential; even though we had done this before. And for those without partnership potential - well, it was probably lampshades time. Which would be my job to execute.

Anyway, as usual, no one said anything, unless specifically asked a question.

Vlad started going through the list. The first three names on the list were men, very senior, and there were lots of questions and flattering responses about their interactions with clients, the size of their practices, potential for them to grow those practices, their ability to delegate and supervise staff etc. etc. etc. All good and useful conversations, leaving aside the fact that most of them had great potential to be arseholes if they made it to partnership.

The fourth person on that list was a woman. Let's call her Brigid. Brigid is a brilliant lawyer, excellent billables, great with clients and staff, pleasant to deal with etc etc etc. Before giving her supervising partner any chance to make a comment, Vlad said:

'Brigid would be a good candidate for partner. She has just turned 40, so is probably unlikely to have children'.

He then proceeded to the next name on the list. For a moment, I sat there stunned. I was the only woman in the room. In the middle of his first sentence in discussing the next male potential candidate, I excused myself and said 'may I ask a question?'

You could hear a pin drop. No one interrupted Vlad when he was speaking. He turned his pale dead eyes towards me and said imperiously 'yes'.

'How many children do you have Vlad?'

'I have four – why?'

'Well, it seems that having four children has not been an impediment to you not only becoming a partner, but becoming a managing partner.'


I then went around and asked each of the male partners in attendance how many children they had. Only two of the ten people did not have any children. Of course those that did all had stepford wives at home caring for the little blighters. They all shuffled in their seats looking down at their feet, no one willing to make eye contact with either Vlad or me, clearly embarrassed.

I was seething with rage inside, but I think I was doing a fairly good job of not showing it. I calmly folded up my compendium and with as much dignity as I could muster, excused myself, and announced I had another meeting to attend and that I would arrange individual meetings with the group heads to discuss their candidates on their merits, thereby guaranteeing the wrath of Vlad.

But in my head I was shouting 'adios mother fuckers you're on your own'

AMFYOYO.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

3 comments:

  1. I am reeling. And yet, I am also not. The ongoing saga, of some men in business and management having NO IDEA (a) how much their SAHM wife does for them and (b) what it takes for a woman do get where they are without her own SAHM.
    On a much lesser scale, this reminds me of my own former workplace, where I was the only female manager at my level with kids. There were 2 other women without kids and four men with between 2 and 4 kids each. The firm put on an "Employee Appreciation Week" with manager activities to reward staff in lieu of an actual budget. One of these guys was the co-ordinator and put out a memo that each manager would put on morning tea for their teams, preferably of the home-baked kind. I sat in the meeting when this was anounced and politely pointed out that not only do I work full time just like them, but unlike them my husband works weekends and my evenings and weekends are already pretty full with preparing our own food; and that if my kids saw me making a cake for work I'd also have to make one for them which means I would have to somehow find time to shop for and bake TWO CAKES this weekend. It took all I had to add "Not everyone has a wife at home with the kids!"
    Everyone looked at the floor and was very embarassed, and I was too of course, and of course I made the damn cake!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course you did. Aren't they all curious beings? One of my employers wanted to organise an Easter egg hunt at 5.30 pm for people with kids under 5. Yep fill up toddlers with chocolate before dinner. Person who came up with that one a childless male. Facepalm!

      Delete
    2. Oh yes I also LOVE family activity days my firm used to organize! So EASY and convenient, and just the way I wanted to spend a weekday afternoon or a Saturday!

      Delete